Which schedule compression technique might involve accepting a lower quality of work?

The correct choice highlights a schedule compression technique that involves intentionally scaling back the quality or quantity of work in order to meet tighter deadlines. In this context, accepting a lower quality of work can mean prioritizing speed over thoroughness, leading to a potentially less polished final product or the omission of detailed elements that would typically enhance quality.

Choosing to do less work can streamline processes and reduce the time required to complete a project. For example, a team may opt to eliminate non-essential features or conduct minimal testing on a product to ensure it is ready by a specific deadline. This reflects a strategic decision where the urgency of timeline constraints takes precedence over achieving optimal quality.

The other options, while also related to schedule compression, do not directly involve compromising on quality as a fundamental component of the strategy. Reducing project scope focuses on cutting down the overall work required without indicating a direct compromise on quality. Using faster methods generally aims at increasing efficiency rather than sacrificing work quality. Adding more resources might help expedite the project by distributing tasks more broadly, potentially maintaining or even improving quality rather than lowering it.